So it's not designed to restore our backups in the first place. But is this really a right thing to do? Bvckup description says "it does not have a restore function". You can of course create a copy of that backup job and switch locations, so it copies everything back. How do we do it? Does Bvckup allows that? It doesn't. Otherwise, if we decide to use our backup location as a new primary source, we are left without a new backup location. new hdd) and then copy all the data back to have a new primary source. What do we do if our primary source fails? Most probably, first we have to find a replacement (e.g. For what? Most probably, to be able to retrieve the data in case our primary source fails to keep the data. We agree to keep that exact copy elsewhere. We want to have an exact copy of something important inside our hdd or some folder. But let's think more about the meaning of the word and a purpose of such a backup. Let me express some of my personal thoughts about it.įirst of all, I understand that the whole idea of this software is an "identical copy". Oct 13, 2013The first time I tried to use Bvckup 2 I encountered the same issue. I want to trust the defaults, because the consequences of making a mistake could be significant. I value simplicity very highly in this situation. Most of the available syncing tools are like this, and as a result I have never been able to settle into using them long term. The consequence of this is that I rarely end up using such software long term, because setting it up every time becomes so mind-intensive (I have to evaluate every little option to make sure I am picking the correct setting). However, I have a huge problem with software that has zillions of options, some of which have potentially huge ramifications. In theory, there is no problem with there being options to allow workarounds for every little edge case. If you want to manually interfere with Bvckup (which is your right), then you should understand the consequences. I don't see why Bvckup (or at least its default settings) should suffer because of this. Sep 20, 2013A lot of the discussion on this topic revolves around manually copying files, i.e. In either case, there will be this big fat warning saying "Do you swear these are true copies of the originals (or do you want to re-copy just in case) ?" However I can see some use in (a) as well. I would personally rather do (b), because it keeps the overall logic of the app simpler and easier to grasp - it always copies everything. (b) Keep it on, but clone c-times from source to destination (a) Switch off c-time processing for this particular backup If it's latter, then it should see whether source and destination are largely the same and whether they only differ in c-times. And the answer is that it should pick it based on whether it's a brand new backup or a takeover of an existing one. It really comes down to a matter of what the default should be. I think making c-time comparison and copying optional is a sensible idea. You were both right because it's Friday (and you would've been both wrong, of course, if it were Monday). PS It would also be nice to be able to upload imaged to the forum to support the bug reports. It went through one by one copying over the full files 70+GB worth even though Delta Copy was enabled and the only difference in these files was the Created/Accessed Dates? I noticed this when I ran Bvckup to update my ISO backup location which I had previously copied over manually. I would have thought it would only look for the modified date? Or is there an option that I am missing to enable this? If I manually copy this file to the backup location using windows explorer the Created and Accessed Dates/Times Differ which is what I would expect.īut if I now run Bvckup manually on this location using "Re-scan destination on every run"(Just to make sure it looks for the file in the destination) it will replace/update this destination file with the source file even though they are exactly the same. The Created, Modified and Accessed Dates/Times are all the same. I could be getting this completely wrong and going crazy! Completely possible :)īut if I create a file in my source location.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |